Colorado Springs to pay GE Johnson $3M to settle Pikes Peak case

PikesPeak2

The Pikes Peak Summit Visitor Center at 14,115 feet includes indoor and outdoor exhibits, walkways and popular donuts. (City of Colorado Springs)

The City of Colorado Springs has agreed to pay $2.95 million to GE Johnson, which built a visitor’s center atop Pikes Peak and then sued the city for ignoring its invoices.

The settlement money will be paid by Pikes Peak – America’s Mountain, a city entity that gets funding from private donations, toll fees, concession sales and revenue bonds.

Half of the money must be paid by mid-July and the other half by year-end, according to a copy of the settlement the city provided. It was signed on June 2.

“The settlement of $2.95 million will come from the PPAM enterprise, not from taxpayer dollars,” Skyler Rorabaugh, the manager of Pikes Peak – America’s Mountain, said in a statement.

“Constructing a building on the summit of a 14er that welcomes more than a million people annually is an impressive accomplishment, and the City of Colorado Springs and PPAM are proud of the work that brought this community vision to life,” he said.

In a second settlement that was signed that same day, GE Johnson agreed to make paving repairs to the west parking lot at the visitor’s center in exchange for $630,000.

Laura Rinker, a spokeswoman for GE Johnson, said both sides consider the settlements fair. 

“We are proud of the work on the Pikes Peak Summit Visitor Center project, which has received widespread acclaim for the outstanding achievements in construction that made its completion possible, and is an impressive asset for the region,” Rinker said in a statement.

PikesPeak1 scaled

The visitor center atop Pikes Peak opened in mid-2021 after three years of work that was led by GE Johnson. (City of Colorado Springs)

GE Johnson sued Colorado Springs on March 8, accusing the city of delaying completion of the $60 million, 38,000-square-foot complex and then refusing to pay the general contractor for its additional work there. The lawsuit did not say how much money GE Johnson was owed.

A month later, Colorado Springs countersued the builder, accusing it of doing shoddy work on that west parking lot, as well as a wastewater system atop Pikes Peak.

Before any of those claims could be litigated, the two sides reached an amicable settlement. The settlement makes clear that neither side is admitting they did anything wrong.

During a special meeting in mid-May, the Colorado Springs City Council unanimously agreed to settle the case, but the exact terms were still being worked out. El Paso District Court Judge Eric Bentley closed the court case on June 8 at the request of both sides.

 

PikesPeak2

The Pikes Peak Summit Visitor Center at 14,115 feet includes indoor and outdoor exhibits, walkways and popular donuts. (City of Colorado Springs)

The City of Colorado Springs has agreed to pay $2.95 million to GE Johnson, which built a visitor’s center atop Pikes Peak and then sued the city for ignoring its invoices.

The settlement money will be paid by Pikes Peak – America’s Mountain, a city entity that gets funding from private donations, toll fees, concession sales and revenue bonds.

Half of the money must be paid by mid-July and the other half by year-end, according to a copy of the settlement the city provided. It was signed on June 2.

“The settlement of $2.95 million will come from the PPAM enterprise, not from taxpayer dollars,” Skyler Rorabaugh, the manager of Pikes Peak – America’s Mountain, said in a statement.

“Constructing a building on the summit of a 14er that welcomes more than a million people annually is an impressive accomplishment, and the City of Colorado Springs and PPAM are proud of the work that brought this community vision to life,” he said.

In a second settlement that was signed that same day, GE Johnson agreed to make paving repairs to the west parking lot at the visitor’s center in exchange for $630,000.

Laura Rinker, a spokeswoman for GE Johnson, said both sides consider the settlements fair. 

“We are proud of the work on the Pikes Peak Summit Visitor Center project, which has received widespread acclaim for the outstanding achievements in construction that made its completion possible, and is an impressive asset for the region,” Rinker said in a statement.

PikesPeak1 scaled

The visitor center atop Pikes Peak opened in mid-2021 after three years of work that was led by GE Johnson. (City of Colorado Springs)

GE Johnson sued Colorado Springs on March 8, accusing the city of delaying completion of the $60 million, 38,000-square-foot complex and then refusing to pay the general contractor for its additional work there. The lawsuit did not say how much money GE Johnson was owed.

A month later, Colorado Springs countersued the builder, accusing it of doing shoddy work on that west parking lot, as well as a wastewater system atop Pikes Peak.

Before any of those claims could be litigated, the two sides reached an amicable settlement. The settlement makes clear that neither side is admitting they did anything wrong.

During a special meeting in mid-May, the Colorado Springs City Council unanimously agreed to settle the case, but the exact terms were still being worked out. El Paso District Court Judge Eric Bentley closed the court case on June 8 at the request of both sides.

 

This story is for our paid subscribers only. Please become one of the thousands of BusinessDen members today!

Your subscription has expired. Renew now by choosing a subscription below!

For more informaiton, head over to your profile.

Profile


SUBSCRIBE NOW

 — 

 — 

 — 

TERMS OF SERVICE:

ALL MEMBERSHIPS RENEW AUTOMATICALLY. YOU WILL BE CHARGED FOR A 1 YEAR MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL AT THE RATE IN EFFECT AT THAT TIME UNLESS YOU CANCEL YOUR MEMBERSHIP BY LOGGING IN OR BY CONTACTING [email protected].

ALL CHARGES FOR MONTHLY OR ANNUAL MEMBERSHIPS ARE NONREFUNDABLE.

EACH MEMBERSHIP WILL ONLY FUNCTION ON UP TO 3 MACHINES. ACCOUNTS ABUSING THAT LIMIT WILL BE DISCONTINUED.

FOR ASSISTANCE WITH YOUR MEMBERSHIP PLEASE EMAIL [email protected]




Return to Homepage

POSTED IN Commercial Real Estate, Law

Editor's Picks

Comments are closed.