Eight Bonnie Brae residents sue to stop neighborhood’s first pot shop

Bonnie Brae main

Businesses line University Boulevard in the Bonnie Brae neighborhood of Denver. (Eric Lutzens/The Denver Post)

Eight residents of Bonnie Brae have sued the city in a last-ditch attempt to stop the neighborhood’s first cannabis dispensary from opening.

“The existence of a marijuana store in their neighborhood is against their needs and desires and will negatively impact their neighborhood,” the lawsuit states.

The seven men and one woman all live within five blocks of 2331 E. Ohio Ave., the proposed future home of a Silver Stem Fine Cannabis location. Their lawsuit, filed Monday in Denver District Court, names Silver Stem, the city and the city’s licensing director as defendants.

“Silver Stem believes both the recommended decision and the final decision were issued correctly,” Lynea Hansen, a spokeswoman for the cannabis company, said in an email Wednesday. “We are aware of the filing and are reviewing its merits.”

The city declined to comment on the lawsuit because it is a pending legal case.

In March, Silver Stem asked the Department of Excise and Licenses to let it transfer one of its existing retail and medical licenses to the Bonnie Brae location. Public hearings were held over two days in June, after which a hearing officer recommended the executive director approve the application. On Nov. 7, it was approved.

The eight suing residents, all of whom testified at the public hearings, take issue with those summer hearings and Director Molly Duplechian’s approval last month.

The plaintiffs claim the hearing officer used an “erroneous” legal standard in deciding whether the shop was right for Bonnie Brae and allowed testimony using that standard.

Meanwhile, Duplechian declined to consider 131 emails, 123 of which were in opposition to the store, because they were filed too late, according to her November decision. The residents believe she was wrong to do so and that her decision ignored “the overwhelming objection to the application among neighborhood residents and parties in interest.”

The residents are asking Judge Christopher Baumann to overturn Duplechian’s decision and order that a new public hearing be held on Silver Stem’s application.

The plaintiffs are Mark Gould, Sarah Kienast, Rohan Ambli, Brendan Murphy, Robert Ghia, Steven Dupont, Jeffrey Thomas and Peter Coursey.

They are represented by attorney Robert Burk with the Centennial law firm Burk & Burk.

Bonnie Brae main

Businesses line University Boulevard in the Bonnie Brae neighborhood of Denver. (Eric Lutzens/The Denver Post)

Eight residents of Bonnie Brae have sued the city in a last-ditch attempt to stop the neighborhood’s first cannabis dispensary from opening.

“The existence of a marijuana store in their neighborhood is against their needs and desires and will negatively impact their neighborhood,” the lawsuit states.

The seven men and one woman all live within five blocks of 2331 E. Ohio Ave., the proposed future home of a Silver Stem Fine Cannabis location. Their lawsuit, filed Monday in Denver District Court, names Silver Stem, the city and the city’s licensing director as defendants.

“Silver Stem believes both the recommended decision and the final decision were issued correctly,” Lynea Hansen, a spokeswoman for the cannabis company, said in an email Wednesday. “We are aware of the filing and are reviewing its merits.”

The city declined to comment on the lawsuit because it is a pending legal case.

In March, Silver Stem asked the Department of Excise and Licenses to let it transfer one of its existing retail and medical licenses to the Bonnie Brae location. Public hearings were held over two days in June, after which a hearing officer recommended the executive director approve the application. On Nov. 7, it was approved.

The eight suing residents, all of whom testified at the public hearings, take issue with those summer hearings and Director Molly Duplechian’s approval last month.

The plaintiffs claim the hearing officer used an “erroneous” legal standard in deciding whether the shop was right for Bonnie Brae and allowed testimony using that standard.

Meanwhile, Duplechian declined to consider 131 emails, 123 of which were in opposition to the store, because they were filed too late, according to her November decision. The residents believe she was wrong to do so and that her decision ignored “the overwhelming objection to the application among neighborhood residents and parties in interest.”

The residents are asking Judge Christopher Baumann to overturn Duplechian’s decision and order that a new public hearing be held on Silver Stem’s application.

The plaintiffs are Mark Gould, Sarah Kienast, Rohan Ambli, Brendan Murphy, Robert Ghia, Steven Dupont, Jeffrey Thomas and Peter Coursey.

They are represented by attorney Robert Burk with the Centennial law firm Burk & Burk.

This story is for our paid subscribers only. Please become one of the thousands of BusinessDen members today!

Your subscription has expired. Renew now by choosing a subscription below!

For more informaiton, head over to your profile.

Profile


SUBSCRIBE NOW

 — 

 — 

 — 

TERMS OF SERVICE:

ALL MEMBERSHIPS RENEW AUTOMATICALLY. YOU WILL BE CHARGED FOR A 1 YEAR MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL AT THE RATE IN EFFECT AT THAT TIME UNLESS YOU CANCEL YOUR MEMBERSHIP BY LOGGING IN OR BY CONTACTING [email protected].

ALL CHARGES FOR MONTHLY OR ANNUAL MEMBERSHIPS ARE NONREFUNDABLE.

EACH MEMBERSHIP WILL ONLY FUNCTION ON UP TO 3 MACHINES. ACCOUNTS ABUSING THAT LIMIT WILL BE DISCONTINUED.

FOR ASSISTANCE WITH YOUR MEMBERSHIP PLEASE EMAIL [email protected]




Return to Homepage

POSTED IN Cannabis, Law

Editor's Picks

Comments are closed.